Racine v. Saul
| Robert M. Racine |
| Commissioner Andrew M. Saul |
| 1:2021cv01802 |
| April 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Andrew M. Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Agreed) (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Arce, Jimmy) |
Filing 7
ORDER : Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 is GRANTED. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 4/9/2021. (See attached Order for further detail.)Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: This matter is before the Court for review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security. The parties are strongly encouraged to consider consenting to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. Should the parties elect to do so, the appropriate form to execute and file with the court may be found at the following location: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_public/consent.pdf. Otherwise, the Court sets the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 45 days after the filing of the answer to the complaint and/or the administrative record. The Commissioner's response and brief in support of affirming the decision subject to review is due 30 days thereafter. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due 10 days thereafter. The Court will not consider extension requests absent extenuating circumstances. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Jimmy Lorenzo Arce as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Arce, Jimmy) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert M. Racine by Maren Ann-miller Bam (Bam, Maren) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cl, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert M. Racine by David F. Chermol (Chermol, David) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Robert M. Racine for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Chermol, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Robert M. Racine; (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Chermol, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Racine v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert M. Racine | |
| Represented By: | David F. Chermol |
| Represented By: | Maren Ann-miller Bam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul | |
| Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Jimmy Lorenzo Arce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
