Costello v. Axtria, Inc.
| Kevin Costello |
| Axtria, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv01856 |
| April 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the 06/07/2021 answer deadline, the initial tracking status hearing of 05/28/2021 is reset to 06/18/2021 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file the joint initial status report by 06/10/2021. Emailed notice (mw, )
|
|
Filing 6
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Axtria, Inc. by Vimal K. Shah (Shah, Vimal)
|
|
Filing 5
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Kevin Costello. Axtria, Inc. waiver sent on 4/7/2021, answer due 6/7/2021. (Ferolie, Albert)
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 05/28/2021 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 05/20/2021. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, )
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Ferolie, Albert)
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kevin Costello by Albert F Ferolie (Ferolie, Albert)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Kevin Costello; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18100059.(Ferolie, Albert)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lxk, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Costello v. Axtria, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Axtria, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Vimal K. Shah |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Costello | |
| Represented By: | Albert F Ferolie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
