The Phoenix Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, an Ohio Corporation
Plaintiff: The Phoenix Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation and The Phoenix Insurance Company
Defendant: The Cincinnati Insurance Company, an Ohio Corporation and The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2021cv01898
Filed: April 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Joan H Lefkow
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint for Declaratory Judgment by The Cincinnati Insurance Company(Odland, Omar)
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The Phoenix Insurance Company by Brent Shelbin Usery (Usery, Brent)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Motion for extension of time to answer #7 is granted. Parties shall meet for the purposes set out in Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 16(a) and by 7/9/2021 submit a report of their Rule 26(f) conference and a proposed scheduling order. The status hearing set for 6/22/2021 is stricken and reset to 7/13/2021 at 11:00 a.m. via telephone conference. Throughout the telephonic hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Please note that the conference call-in will be used by all cases that are on the court's calendar for the said date, therefore counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line and must have the telephone muted until your case is called. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is (877) 402-9753 and the access code is 1564342. Counsel of record will receive an email the day before the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice (ags)
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant The Cincinnati Insurance Company for extension of time to file answer to Declaratory Judgment Complaint (Odland, Omar)
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Cincinnati Insurance Company by Omar S. Odland (Odland, Omar)
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Cincinnati Insurance Company. (acm, )
April 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Initial status hearing is set for 6/22/2021 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ags)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The Phoenix Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation by Sara Frances Marzullo (Marzullo, Sara)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement STATEMENT by The Phoenix Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation (Marzullo, Sara)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marzullo, Sara)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT filed by The Phoenix Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18108580. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Underlying Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Prime Contract, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - The Subcontract)(Marzullo, Sara)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Phoenix Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, an Ohio Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Cincinnati Insurance Company, an Ohio Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Represented By: Omar S. Odland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Phoenix Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation
Represented By: Sara Frances Marzullo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Phoenix Insurance Company
Represented By: Sara Frances Marzullo
Represented By: Brent Shelbin Usery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?