The Phoenix Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, an Ohio Corporation
The Phoenix Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation and The Phoenix Insurance Company |
The Cincinnati Insurance Company, an Ohio Corporation and The Cincinnati Insurance Company |
1:2021cv01898 |
April 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Joan H Lefkow |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint for Declaratory Judgment by The Cincinnati Insurance Company(Odland, Omar) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The Phoenix Insurance Company by Brent Shelbin Usery (Usery, Brent) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Motion for extension of time to answer #7 is granted. Parties shall meet for the purposes set out in Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 16(a) and by 7/9/2021 submit a report of their Rule 26(f) conference and a proposed scheduling order. The status hearing set for 6/22/2021 is stricken and reset to 7/13/2021 at 11:00 a.m. via telephone conference. Throughout the telephonic hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Please note that the conference call-in will be used by all cases that are on the court's calendar for the said date, therefore counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line and must have the telephone muted until your case is called. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is (877) 402-9753 and the access code is 1564342. Counsel of record will receive an email the day before the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice (ags) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant The Cincinnati Insurance Company for extension of time to file answer to Declaratory Judgment Complaint (Odland, Omar) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Cincinnati Insurance Company by Omar S. Odland (Odland, Omar) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Cincinnati Insurance Company. (acm, ) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Initial status hearing is set for 6/22/2021 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ags) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The Phoenix Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation by Sara Frances Marzullo (Marzullo, Sara) |
Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement STATEMENT by The Phoenix Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation (Marzullo, Sara) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marzullo, Sara) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT filed by The Phoenix Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18108580. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Underlying Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Prime Contract, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - The Subcontract)(Marzullo, Sara) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.