Avina v. Qualia Collection Services
| Jose Avina |
| Qualia Collection Services |
| 1:2021cv01993 |
| April 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Beth W Jantz |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
REPLY by Jose Avina to memorandum in opposition to motion #18 (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 18
MEMORANDUM by Qualia Collection Services in Opposition to motion to remand #10 (Little, Brendan)
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Beth W. Jantz: The Court has reviewed the parties' recent Joint Status Report #16 and adopts their proposed discovery schedule insofar as Rule 26 disclosures shall issue by 6/4/21, and written discovery shall issue by 7/7/21. The 5/21/21 telephonic initial status conference is stricken and reset for 7/22/21, at 10:15 a.m. To join the status conference by phone, counsel shall dial 888-273-3658 and enter access code 2217918. (rbf, )
|
|
Filing 16
STATUS Report by Jose Avina (Chatman, Celetha)
|
|
Filing 15
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's motion to stay briefing on the motion to dismiss pending resolution of the motion to remand #13 is granted because the motion to remand raises the threshold issue of subject matter jurisdiction. See Bazile v. Fin. Sys. of Green Bay, Inc., 983 F.3d 274, 278 (7th Cir. 2020). The briefing schedule on defendant's motion to dismiss entered on 4/21/2021 #7 is stricken. The briefing schedule on plaintiff's motion to remand #11 stands. Mailed notice (axc).
|
|
Filing 14
RESPONSE by Qualia Collection Servicesin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Jose Avina to stay Briefing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pending the Resolution of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand #13 (Little, Brendan)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION by Plaintiff Jose Avina to stay Briefing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pending the Resolution of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 12
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jose Avina by Daniel Richard Brown (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand #10 as follows: Defendant's response due on or before 05/20/2021; Plaintiff's reply due on or before 06/03/2021. The Court will rule on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand #10 via CM/ECF. Mailed notice (axc).
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION by Plaintiff Jose Avina to remand (Chatman, Celetha)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Beth W. Jantz: This case has been referred to the Magistrate Judge for discovery supervision and for proceedings related to a settlement conference. The parties are directed to review Judge Jantz's standing orders on initial status conferences and reports, and on settlement conferences. A telephonic initial status conference is scheduled for 05/21/2021 at 10:45am, and a Joint Initial Status Report shall be filed by 05/13/2021. To join the status conference by phone, counsel shall dial 888-273-3658 and enter access code 2217918. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing as well. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. (rbf, )
|
|
Filing 8
Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Beth W. Jantz for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision, including setting all deadlines, and settlement matters. (axc) Mailed notice.
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on Defendant Qualia Collection Services' opposed motion to dismiss #5 as follows: Plaintiff's response due on or before 05/12/2021; Defendant's reply due on or before 05/26/2021. The court will rule on Defendant Qualia Collection Services' motion to dismiss #5 via CM/ECF. The joint initial status report due on 6/28/2021 is stricken. The Court refers discovery supervision, including setting all deadlines, and settlement matters to Magistrate Judge Jantz. Mailed notice (axc).
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM by Qualia Collection Services in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #5 (Little, Brendan)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Qualia Collection Services (Little, Brendan)
|
|
Filing 4
MAILED notice of removal letter to counsel of record. (ph, )
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 6/28/2021, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report.' The court will enter a scheduling order in response. The removing party must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the opposing party has not been served with notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1446(d), the removing party's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at analeah_charles@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the Joint Initial Status Report deadline. The removing party should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the opposing party has been given notice of removal. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 joint status report) (axc).
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Qualia Collection Services by Brendan Hoffman Little (Little, Brendan)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE of Removal from Cook County, case number (2021CH00950) filed by Qualia Collection Services Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18123631. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Little, Brendan)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cp, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Avina v. Qualia Collection Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jose Avina | |
| Represented By: | Michael Jacob Wood |
| Represented By: | Daniel Richard Brown |
| Represented By: | Celetha Chatman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Qualia Collection Services | |
| Represented By: | Brendan Hoffman Little |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
