Clarke v. Examity, Inc.
| Paul Clarke |
| Examity, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv02081 |
| April 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Defendant Examity, Inc.'s unopposed motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to complaint #5 is granted. Defendant Examity, Inc.'s responsive pleading due on or before 7/16/2021. The joint initial status report deadline is extended from 8/20/2021. Mailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Defendant Examity, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 or otherwise plead (Unopposed) (Siebert, Melissa) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Examity, Inc. by Melissa Anne Siebert (Siebert, Melissa) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Paul Clarke as to Examity, Inc. on 5/19/2021, answer due 6/9/2021. (Malmstrom, Carl) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Examity, Inc. (cm, ) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 6/30/2021, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report.' The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at analeah_charles@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the Joint Initial Status Report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 joint status report) (axc). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Class Action) filed by Paul Clarke; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18136849. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Malmstrom, Carl) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clarke v. Examity, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Examity, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Anne Siebert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paul Clarke | |
| Represented By: | Carl V. Malmstrom |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
