Page v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
| Martin Page |
| Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv02088 |
| April 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Martin Page regarding Summons and Complaint served on Davol Inc. on 04/22/2021 (Gardiner, Thomas) |
| ELECTRONIC Acknowledgement of case transferred to the Southern District of Ohio as case 2:21-cv-02407, filed 05/11/2021. (aee, ) |
| Filing 7 TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of Ohio the electronic record. (jn, ) |
| Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from MDL Panel transferring case to the Southern District of Ohio. Mailed notice. (jn, ) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated pursuant to MDL 2846 Conditional Transfer Order filed 5/7/2021. (jn, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc. (dxb, ) |
| Filing 5 First AMENDED complaint by Martin Page against All Defendants (Gardiner, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the complaint, R. 1, the Court issues the following jurisdictional inquiry. The Plaintiff relies on diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. 1332, for subject matter jurisdiction. R. 1, para. 10. The Plaintiff alleges that he is a "resident" of Illinois, but does not say whether he is a citizen of Illinois. Id., para. 2. It is the citizenship of partiesas distinct from residencythat matters. Hunter v. Amin, 583 F.3d 486, 491 (7th Cir. 2009). The Plaintiff shall either amend the complaint by 05/12/2021 with the necessary allegations (if he can do so in good faith), or file a memorandum by that date explaining why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Initial tracking status hearing set for 05/28/21 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 05/20/2021. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| Filing 3 JURY Demand (Gardiner, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gardiner, Thomas) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc (txl, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Martin Page; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18138159.(Gardiner, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
