Ipsen v. Cardenas et al
| Matthew Ipsen |
| Sebastian Cardenas and Dennis O'Shea |
| 1:2021cv02144 |
| April 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION by Defendants Sebastian Cardenas, Dennis O'Shea for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Scott, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 7/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Initial Status Report outline) (rao, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Sebastian Cardenas, Dennis O'Shea by Thomas G. DiCianni (DiCianni, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Sebastian Cardenas, Dennis O'Shea by Andrew Kenneday Scott (Scott, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Matthew Ipsen by Edward M. Fox (Fox, Edward) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Matthew Ipsen by Garrett W. Browne (Browne, Garrett) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Matthew Ipsen; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18153363. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Browne, Garrett) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lxk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
