Anderson v. Gomez et al
| William Anderson |
| Lopez, David Gomez, Randy Malkowski and John Doe's |
| 1:2021cv02225 |
| April 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: The Court denies Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 . Plaintiff must pay the full statutory filing fee of $402.00. He may pay by check or money order payable to Clerk, United States District Court. He should mail payment to Clerk, United States District Court, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604, attn: Cashier's Desk. If he fails to remit the fee by June 10, 2021, the Court will dismiss this case. The Court will review Plaintiff's complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A and consider Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation after Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 5/13/2021. Mailed notice. (kl, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff William Anderson for attorney representation (lma, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff William Anderson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (lma, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (lma, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by William Anderson. (Exhibits) (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
