Roohizadegan et al v. Mayorkas et al
| PAYAM ROOHIZADEGAN and ZOHREH JAHANDARPOUR |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and ANTONY BLINKEN |
| 1:2021cv02326 |
| April 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles R Norgle |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zohreh Jahandarpour as to All Defendants. (Baniassadi, Mohammad) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zohreh Jahandarpour as to All Defendants. (Baniassadi, Mohammad) |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Antony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Antony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Payam Roohizadegan (Baniassadi, Mohammad) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Antony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (dxb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS filed by PAYAM ROOHIZADEGAN; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18192450. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baniassadi, Mohammad) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mxo, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
