Huggins v. The City of Chicago et al
| Gregory Huggins |
| The City of Chicago |
| 1:2021cv02359 |
| May 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Gregory Huggins for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits, Envelope not postmarked) (daj, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER: The Court denies Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 without prejudice. If Plaintiff wants the Court to screen his complaint, he must file a properly supported amended in forma pauperis application that accurately discloses his income starting twelve months prior to initiating this action (in other words, approximately May 1, 2020) and ending on the date of compliance. He must also include a trust fund certification completed by an authorized correctional official with supporting trust fund ledgers beginning on November 1, 2020, and ending on the date of compliance. Alternatively, Plaintiff may prepay the full $402 filing fee. If Plaintiff does not comply by June 10, 2021, the Court will summarily dismiss this case. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice as he did not answer the question on the Court's form requiring him to provide specifics about what he has done to attempt to obtain counsel himself and whether an indigent litigant has made a reasonable attempt to obtain his own attorney is a "mandatory, threshold inquiry," Eagan v. Dempsey, 987 F.3d 667 (7th Cir. 2021); in any event, nothing suggests that Plaintiff is unable to address his fee status on his own. Plaintiff must promptly update his address if he is released or transferred to another facility. If he fails to do so, this case will be subject to dismissal with no further warning. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of this order and an in forma pauperis form for incarcerated persons. Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 5/10/2021: Mailed notice (daj, )
|
| MAILED copy of order #5 , in forma pauperis form for incarcerated persons to Gregory Huggins (daj, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Gregory Huggins for attorney representation (daj, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Gregory Huggins for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (daj, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (daj, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint by Gregory Huggins. (Envelope not postmarked) (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Huggins v. The City of Chicago et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The City of Chicago | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gregory Huggins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
