Stumpf v. Rohlig USA, LLC
| Todd Stumpf |
| Rohlig USA, LLC |
| 1:2021cv02377 |
| May 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Susan E Cox |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox: This case has been sent to Judge Cox for discovery supervision. In light of new counsel appearing in this case, the parties are ordered to file an amended Rule 26(f) Planning Report on or before 7/9/21. The Court will set additional deadlines upon receipt and review of that report. Mailed notice (np, ) |
| Filing 21 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Todd Stumpf by Neal Charles Zazove (Zazove, Neal) |
| Filing 20 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Susan E. Cox for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision, including the authority to adjust all deadlines. (mw, ) Emailed notice. |
| Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The motion of attorney Neal Zazove to appear as counsel #18 is granted. Given the appearance of counsel, the extension motion of the Plaintiff #15 is terminated without prejudice. Discovery shall get going again with a counsel for the Plaintiff. The Court refers discovery supervision to the magistrate judge, including the authority to adjust all deadlines. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 18 MOTION by Plaintiff Todd Stumpf for leave to appear as Appearance on behalf of Plaintiff (Zazove, Neal) |
| Filing 17 SUPPLEMENT to motion for extension of time to complete discovery #15 by Plaintiff Todd Stumpf. (Attachment) (ec, ) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE by Rohlig USA, LLC to MOTION by Plaintiff Todd Stumpf for extension of time to complete discovery #15 (Ritter, David) |
| Filing 15 MOTION by Plaintiff Todd Stumpf for extension of discovery. (ec, ) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the initial status report, R. 13, the Court sets the following schedule. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures due 06/11/2021. The first round of written discovery requests must be issued by 06/25/2021. Fact discovery, including any treating health care providers (if any), must be completed by 10/04/2021. Rule 26(a)(2)(C) summaries for treating health care providers (if any) must be disclosed 45 days in advance of the fact discovery deadline, and adjusts with any general extension of fact discovery deadline. Rule 16(b) deadline to add parties or amend pleadings is 08/02/2021. The deadline to serve subpoenas is 08/16/2021, absent good cause (e.g., genuine surprise despite due diligence). By 09/07/2021, the parties shall file a Deposition Scheduling Report listing the depositions already taken and (more importantly) the remaining deponents, all of whom must have ***confirmed*** deposition dates (not just proposed dates). Any person not on that Report will presumptively not be deposed without good cause (e.g., genuine surprise despite due diligence). If deponents are slow in confirming deposition dates, the parties should use the Report deadline to urge each other and non-parties to provide confirmed dates to avoid a motion to compel in advance of the deadline. The Court notifies the Plaintiff of the availability of pro se resources, including a Pro Se Help Desk. https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_prose/proseguide%2001-11.pdf. The tracking status hearing of 07/02/2021 is reset to 08/06/2021 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file a discovery progress report by 07/30/2021. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Rohlig USA, LLC (Ritter, David) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by Rohlig USA, LLC(Ritter, David) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Rohlig USA, LLC by Douglas Matthew Oldham (Oldham, Douglas) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Rohlig USA, LLC by David Brian Ritter (Ritter, David) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Court notes that the Plaintiff has paid the filing fee, but he also provided USM-285 service forms. The Marshals Service is generally not appointed to serve private civil complaints unless the Plaintiff has obtained in forma pauperis status. So the Plaintiff should be pursuing service on his own; or file an in forma pauperis application asking for the Marshals Service to be appointed; or otherwise explain why it would be appropriate to require the Marshals Service to serve process. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 07/02/2021 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 06/24/2021. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If Defendant has not been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT filed by Todd Stumpf; Jury Demand. (Exhibits). (jn, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Rohlig USA, LLC (jn, ) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jn, ) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Todd Stumpf (ec, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Todd Stumpf. (Exhibits) (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stumpf v. Rohlig USA, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Todd Stumpf | |
| Represented By: | Neal Charles Zazove |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rohlig USA, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David Brian Ritter |
| Represented By: | Douglas Matthew Oldham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
