Kohler v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Andrew Kohler |
Midland Credit Management, Inc. |
1:2021cv02487 |
May 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Joan B Gottschall |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's unopposed motion (No. #14 ) to extend its deadline to respond to the pending motion to dismiss is granted. The briefing schedule for the motion (No. #12 ) is enlarged as follows: response due: 7/22/2021; reply due: 7/29/2021. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
Filing 14 MOTION by Plaintiff Andrew Kohler for extension of time to file response/reply as to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,, motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction, #12 , set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings,, terminate hearings, #13 Unopposed (Carlin, John) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Defendant's motion (No. #12 ) to dismiss the complaint is briefed as follows: response due: 6/30/2021; reply due: 7/7/2021. The deadline of 7/9/2021 to file an initial status report is stricken. The court will rule by mail on the motion to dismiss and set a further date, if necessary, when it rules. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. , MOTION by Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Voluntary Petition)(McGivney, Michael) |
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Defendant's unopposed motion (No. #7 ) for an extension to and including 6/16/2021 of the deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is granted. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
Filing 10 DOCUMENT ENTERED IN ERROR. (mjc, ). |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. by Douglas R Sargent (Sargent, Douglas) |
Filing 8 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Midland Credit Management, Inc. (McGivney, Michael) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Unopposed (McGivney, Michael) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. by Nicholas D. O'Conner (O'Conner, Nicholas) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. by Michael McGivney (McGivney, Michael) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrew Kohler as to Andrew Kohler on 5/12/2021, answer due 6/2/2021. (Carlin, John) |
Filing 3 ORDER: An initial status report and, if appropriate, case management plan is due on or before July 9, 2021. The parties are directed to consult Judge Gottschall's website for specific requirements for all written status reports and for the discovery plans. In conformity with the Tenth Amended General Order 20-12 and due to the need for social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, this court is ordering written status reports instead of routine oral status hearings. This includes initial status hearings and scheduling conferences under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). See Judge Gottschall's website for the procedure for requesting a hearing. No Rule 26(f) discovery plan should be submitted until all defendants have been served. If all defendants have not been served by the deadline for filing an initial status report, the report should so state and propose a deadline for filing a discovery plan. The parties are directed to discuss settlement and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. They are further directed to meet and confer regarding a proposed discovery plan. See Judge Gottschall's civil case management packet regarding pretrial case management procedures at: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 5/10/202. Mailed notice(mjc, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (crl, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. (cp, ) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Andrew Kohler by John P Carlin (Carlin, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Andrew Kohler; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18223960. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Carlin, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kohler v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Andrew Kohler | |
Represented By: | John P Carlin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Douglas R Sargent |
Represented By: | Michael McGivney |
Represented By: | Nicholas D. O'Conner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.