Barney v. Gomez et al
| Kadmiel Barney |
| C. Truitt, D. Hunter and D. Gomez |
| 1:2021cv02531 |
| May 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Plaintiff has submitted a complaint #1 but did not prepay the filing fee or file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Because Plaintiff was incarcerated when he filed suit, by 7/26/2021 he must either:(1) submit a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis that includes the documentation and certification described below; or (2) pre-pay the full statutory filing fee of $402.00. If he does not comply, the court will summarily dismiss this case. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a copy of this order. Status hearing set for 8/10/2021 at 9:30 a.m. Signed by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 6/28/2021. Mailed notice. (bg, )
|
| MAILED order dated 6/28/2021 and a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis to Plaintiff. (bg, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (gw, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Kadmiel Barney (Envelope postmarked 5/3/2021) (gw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
