Fogarty v. Saul
| George Fogarty |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| 1:2021cv02596 |
| May 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Susan E Cox |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox: Plaintiff's Application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. Having reviewed the affidavit and financial application, the Court finds that requiring Plaintiff to pay the filing fee for this case would likely interfere with the necessities of life. See Bryant v. Whalen, No. 88cv4834, 1992 WL 198946, 5 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 12, 1992). Mailed notice (np, )
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox: This case has been reassigned to Judge Cox. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint by 8/11/2021 and deliver a courtesy copy to Room 1024. Pursuant to Local Rule 8.1(b), the Social Security Administration's filing of the certified administrative record, in and of itself, shall suffice as the agency's answer to the complaint. Plaintiff's opening brief is due on or before 10/11/2021. Defendant's response brief is due on or before 11/29/2021. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due on or before 12/13/2021. Mailed notice (np, )
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Susan E. Cox pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Edmond E. Chang no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 5/18/2021. (nsf, )
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the joint consent to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction, R. 6, the consent will be processed with the Executive Committee. Emailed notice (mw, )
|
|
Filing 6
JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Bam, Maren)
|
|
Filing 5
DESIGNATION of Kurt N. Lindland as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Lindland, Kurt)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff George Fogarty by Maren Ann-miller Bam (Bam, Maren)
|
|
Filing 3
APPLICATION by Plaintiff George Fogarty for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Bam, Maren)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bam, Maren)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by George Fogarty; (Bam, Maren)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (crl, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fogarty v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
| Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Kurt N. Lindland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: George Fogarty | |
| Represented By: | Maren Ann-miller Bam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
