Smith v. Kovitz Shifrin Nesbit
| Spencer L. Smith |
| Kovitz Shifrin Nesbit |
| 1:2021cv02598 |
| May 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice and each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees pursuant to the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Action #10 filed by Plaintiff on 6/25/2021. (rao, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Spencer L. Smith With Prejudice (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Pursuant to the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #8 , this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice, with leave to reinstate the case on or before August 2, 2021. On August 3, 2021, the dismissal will automatically convert to a dismissal with prejudice, with the Parties bearing their own costs and attorneys' fees. Civil case terminated. (rao, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Spencer L. Smith Without Prejudice With Leave to Reinstate (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Spencer L. Smith. Kovitz Shifrin Nesbit waiver sent on 5/13/2021, answer due 7/12/2021. (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kovitz Shifrin Nesbit by Nicholas R Mitchell (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Mitchell, Nicholas) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kovitz Shifrin Nesbit by Brandon Richard Wilson (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Wilson, Brandon) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Spencer L. Smith by David Scott Klain (Klain, David) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Spencer L. Smith by Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Spencer L. Smith; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18244266. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1st Collection Letter, #2 Exhibit B-2nd Collection Letter)(Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (as, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Kovitz Shifrin Nesbit | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Spencer L. Smith | |
| Represented By: | David Scott Klain |
| Represented By: | Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kovitz Shifrin Nesbit | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas R Mitchell |
| Represented By: | Brandon Richard Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
