Sullivan v. Saul
| Wesley Sullivan |
| Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
| 1:2021cv02762 |
| May 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Steven C Seeger |
| Maria Valdez |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Maria Valdez: Defendant's Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record #12 is granted. The time for filing the administrative record is extended to 9/20/21. Mailed notice (lp, )
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION by Defendant Andrew M. Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Agreed (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Hancock, Virginia)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Maria Valdez: This matter has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez for ruling on final disposition of this case. The Parties are directed to review the LR 16.4 Scheduling in Social Security Cases available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov and this Court's Standing Order in Social Security Cases. No further order will be entered regarding setting dates for a briefing schedule. Mailed notice (lp, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Maria Valdez, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Judge Steven C. Seeger no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 6/4/2021.(exr, )
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Based upon the filing of the joint consent (Dckt. No. #8 ), this case will be sent to the Executive Committee for reassignment to the assigned Magistrate Judge. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
|
Filing 8
JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Hancock, Virginia)
|
|
Filing 7
DESIGNATION of Virginia Ovitz Hancock as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Hancock, Virginia)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dckt. No. #2 ) is hereby granted. The Court sua sponte extends the deadline for the parties to confer and file a statement about consenting to the Magistrate Judge. The revised deadline is June 22, 2021. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court directs the parties to consider whether they would like to consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge for all purposes. A PDF version of the Magistrate Judge Consent Form is available on the Court's website. Counsel shall confer in good faith and shall file a joint statement by June 11, 2021 indicating if they will consent to proceed to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge for all purposes. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wesley Sullivan by Neil H. Good (Good, Neil)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Good, Neil)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Wesley Sullivan for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Good, Neil)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Wesley Sullivan; (Good, Neil)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cm, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
