Gonzales v. Capio Partners, LLC et al
| Sanjuanita Gonzales |
| Capio Partners, LLC and CF Medical, LLC |
| 1:2021cv02766 |
| May 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REMAND with certified copy of order dated 6/7/2021 and letter to Circuit Court of Cook County via email. (exr, ) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Pursuant to the stipulation to remand, R. 11, the case is remanded forthwith to the Cook County Circuit Court, each side to bear its own fees and costs. The Plaintiff's motion #10 to remand is terminated. The tracking status hearing of 06/25/2021 is vacated. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION to Remand Removed Action (Drew, Michael) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff Sanjuanita Gonzales to remand (Drew, Michael) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The defense's unopposed extension motion to answer or to respond to the complaint #8 is granted to 06/11/2021. Initial tracking status hearing set for 06/25/2021 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 06/18/2021. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendants CF Medical, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC for extension of time to file answer unopposed (Marcus, Morgan) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sanjuanita Gonzales by Michael William Drew (Drew, Michael) |
| Filing 6 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (mc, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants CF Medical, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC by Andrew E Cunningham (Cunningham, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by CF Medical, LLC (Marcus, Morgan) |
| Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Capio Partners, LLC (Marcus, Morgan) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants CF Medical, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC by Morgan Ian Marcus (Marcus, Morgan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2021CH01715) filed by CF Medical, LLC, Capio Partners, LLC Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18274443. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-Docket, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marcus, Morgan) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lxk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
