Larde I.V. v. City of Chicago et al
| CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER JANE DOE and BOB LARDE I.V. |
| CHICAGO POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOES 1-11, City of Chicago, John Does 1-11 and Jane Doe |
| 1:2021cv02915 |
| May 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Defendant City of Chicago's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint #9 is granted to 7/30/21. Motion hearing date of 6/29/21 is stricken. Telephonic status hearing set for 8/10/21 at 9:30 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 8/5/21. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is 888-808-6929 and the access code is 4911854. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, ) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bob Larde I.V. by Neal S Gainsberg (Gainsberg, Neal) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed NOTICE of Motion by Cheryl Lynne Friedman for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #9 before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 6/29/2021 at 09:30 AM. (Friedman, Cheryl) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Friedman, Cheryl) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Cheryl Lynne Friedman (Friedman, Cheryl) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Defendant City of Chicago regarding Complaint served on Defendant City of Chicago by serving Kevin Kimmel, Staff Assistant at City of Chicago on 06/02/2021, SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bob Larde I.V. as to City of Chicago on 6/2/2021, answer due 6/23/2021. (Gutierrez, Samantha) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bob Larde I.V. by Samantha Gutierrez (Gutierrez, Samantha) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gutierrez, Samantha) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gutierrez, Samantha) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant City of Chicago. (as, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, ) |
| Filing 4 DIGITAL EXHIBIT submitted by Bob Larde I.V. regarding #1 For more information, please visit https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/ExhibitDrop. If you wish to download a digital exhibit, please send your request to the Certified Copy Desk (CCD) inbox at CCD_ILND@ilnd.uscourts.gov. You will be provided with an invoice and charged according to the Fee Schedule. Once your payment has been processed, you will receive a URL via email to download the exhibit. (mp, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and REFERENCED VIDEO FOOTAGE EXHIBITS filed by BOB LARDE I.V.; jury demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18301488.(Gutierrez, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
