Hammad v. Wray et al
| Mohammad Hammad |
| Director Christopher A. Wray, Thomas Cioppa, Mike Pompeo, Acting Secretary Chad Wolf, Christopher A. Wray and Chad Wolf |
| 1:2021cv02966 |
| June 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Joan H Lefkow |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Thomas Cioppa, Mike Pompeo, Chad Wolf, Christopher A. Wray (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Thomas Cioppa, Mike Pompeo, Chad Wolf, Christopher A. Wray (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Initial status hearing is set for 8/31/2021 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ags) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Thomas Cioppa, Mike Pompeo, Chad Wolf, Christopher A. Wray, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (cp, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mohammad Hammad by Reem H Odeh (Odeh, Reem) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mohammad Hammad; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18311332. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Odeh, Reem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
