Street v. Footprint Acquisition, LLC
Lorri Street |
Footprint Acquisition, LLC |
1:2021cv02975 |
June 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Thomas M Durkin |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Plaintiff has filed her first amended complaint. The Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #9 is denied as moot. Defendant has 21 days from the date of the filing of the first amended to answer or otherwise plead. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
Filing 12 First AMENDED complaint by Lorri Street against Lorri Street (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 11 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Footprint Acquisition, LLC (Morrison, John) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM by Footprint Acquisition, LLC in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #9 (Morrison, John) |
Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Footprint Acquisition, LLC (Morrison, John) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Footprint Acquisition, LLC by John Thomas Roache (Roache, John) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Footprint Acquisition, LLC by Megan M Kokontis (Kokontis, Megan) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Footprint Acquisition, LLC by John Peirce Morrison (Morrison, John) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lorri Street as to Footprint Acquisition, LLC on 6/11/2021, answer due 7/2/2021. (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Lorri Street of Consent to Join -- Jack Board (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: By 8/12/2021, the parties are to file a joint status report. The parties may refer to the format detailed on the Court's website under New and Reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lorri Street by Joshua Jon Sanford (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lorri Street; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18313416. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Consent to Join -- Lorri Street)(Sanford, Joshua) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Footprint Acquisition, LLC (crl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Street v. Footprint Acquisition, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Footprint Acquisition, LLC | |
Represented By: | John Peirce Morrison |
Represented By: | John Thomas Roache |
Represented By: | Megan M Kokontis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lorri Street | |
Represented By: | Joshua Jon Sanford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.