THINK PRODUCTS INC v. ACCO Brands Corp. et al
Plaintiff: THINK PRODUCTS INC
Defendant: Acco Brands USA LLC and ACCO Brands Corp.
Case Number: 1:2021cv03071
Filed: June 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Charles R Norgle
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2021 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants ACCO Brands Corp., Acco Brands USA LLC by Michael R. Weiner (Weiner, Michael)
July 2, 2021 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants ACCO Brands Corp., Acco Brands USA LLC by Thomas L. Duston (Duston, Thomas)
July 2, 2021 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants ACCO Brands Corp., Acco Brands USA LLC by John Joseph Lucas (Lucas, John)
July 2, 2021 Filing 8 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by ACCO Brands Corp., Acco Brands USA LLC (Weiner, Michael)
July 2, 2021 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by ACCO Brands Corp., Acco Brands USA LLC(Weiner, Michael)
June 16, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by THINK PRODUCTS INC as to Acco Brands USA LLC on 6/11/2021, answer due 7/2/2021. (Dolgin, Jay)
June 16, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by THINK PRODUCTS INC as to ACCO Brands Corp. on 6/11/2021, answer due 7/2/2021. (Dolgin, Jay)
June 9, 2021 Filing 4 MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (gcy, )
June 9, 2021 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants ACCO Brands Corp., Acco Brands USA LLC (crl, )
June 8, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE by THINK PRODUCTS INC re complaint #1 , civil cover sheet #2 Plaintiff Think Products Inc.'s Local Rule 3.4 Notice of Claims Involving Patents (Dolgin, Jay)
June 8, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Dolgin, Jay)
June 8, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement filed by THINK PRODUCTS INC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18330447. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint Exhibits 1-7)(Dolgin, Jay)
June 8, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THINK PRODUCTS INC v. ACCO Brands Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acco Brands USA LLC
Represented By: John Joseph Lucas
Represented By: Michael R. Weiner
Represented By: Thomas L. Duston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACCO Brands Corp.
Represented By: John Joseph Lucas
Represented By: Michael R. Weiner
Represented By: Thomas L. Duston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THINK PRODUCTS INC
Represented By: Jay L. Dolgin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?