Lindsey v. City of Chicago
| Anthony Lindsey |
| CITY OF CHICAGO |
| 1:2021cv03156 |
| June 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 754 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Confidentiality Order Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 12/14/2021. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: This Court has considered Defendant's motion for entry of confidentiality order #13 and Plaintiff's partial opposition #17 . Plaintiff opposes the designation of confidential information to include disciplinary records, hiring and/or promotion records, and information and materials from investigative files. This Court agrees with Defendant, however, that "because of the privacy interests at stake, and in particular the privacy interests of non-parties, it is appropriate to produce these documents only after designating them 'Confidential.'" Gordon v. Countryside Nursing & Rehab. Ctr., LLC, No. 11 C 2433, 2012 WL 2905607, at *3 (N.D. Ill. July 16, 2012); see also Davis v. Precoat Metals, a Div. of Sequa Corp., No. 01 C 5689, 2002 WL 1759828, at *4 (N.D. Ill. July 29, 2002) (ordering personnel records be subject to "an appropriate protective order ensuring that those files will be limited to attorneys' eyes only and that they can be used only for purposes of this litigation"). Additionally, although Plaintiff objects to the redaction of personal telephone numbers and personal email addresses, courts generally consider such redactions appropriate to guard privacy interests. Davis, 2002 WL 1759828, at *4; Prince v. Kato, No. 18-CV-2952, 2019 WL 3554533, at *5 (N.D. Ill. July 30, 2019). This Court accordingly grants Defendant's motion for entry of its proposed confidentiality order #13 . Enter Confidentiality Order. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE by Anthony Lindseyin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant City Of Chicago for protective order #13 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Dahms, Ronald) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's opposed motion for protective order #13 . On or before 12/9/21, Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant's motion and submit his own proposed confidentiality order to the Court's proposed order inbox. The Court will rule after considering the parties' submissions. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: The court has reviewed the joint status report on discovery. The parties have produced written discovery responses and a limited number of documents. However, the parties are awaiting a ruling on the City's Motion for a Protective Order (Dkt. No. 13) before producing the remainder of responsive documents. Parties will meet and confer regarding ESI search terms and other discovery issues. Plaintiff has sent a settlement demand to defendant. Defendant does not believe a settlement conference would be productive. On or before 2/28/22, parties shall file a status report updating the court on the status of discovery. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 14 STATUS Report on Discovery (Joint) by Anthony Lindsey (Dahms, Ronald) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Defendant City Of Chicago for protective order (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Honorow, Rena) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: The court has reviewed the joint initial status report. The court adopts the parties' proposed discovery deadlines as follows: The Parties will exchange initial Rule 26 Discovery Disclosures by September 27, 2021. The parties will issue written discovery requests by October 18, 2021. Fact discovery to close February 17, 2022. The Parties do not currently anticipate the need for expert discovery. On or before 11/30/21, parties shall file a joint written status report updating the court on the status of discovery and whether a settlement conference would be productive. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 11 STATUS Report (Joint Initial) by Anthony Lindsey (Geiger, Paul) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses by City Of Chicago(Honorow, Rena) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Defendant's motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #8 is granted over Plaintiff's objection. The City shall answer or otherwise plead by 8/20/21. The deadline of 8/25/21 for parties to file a joint initial status report #5 is re-set to 9/10/21. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant City Of Chicago for extension of time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Honorow, Rena) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Rena M. Honorow (Honorow, Rena) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Susan Margaret O'Keefe (O'Keefe, Susan) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 8/25/21, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant City Of Chicago (jg, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anthony Lindsey by Ronald C. Dahms (Dahms, Ronald) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anthony Lindsey by Paul D. Geiger (Geiger, Paul) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Geiger, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Anthony Lindsey; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18345030.(Geiger, Paul) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lindsey v. City of Chicago | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CITY OF CHICAGO | |
| Represented By: | Rena M. Honorow |
| Represented By: | Susan Margaret O'Keefe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony Lindsey | |
| Represented By: | Ronald C. Dahms |
| Represented By: | Paul D. Geiger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
