LKQ Corporation et al v. Hyundai Motor America et al
Plaintiff: LKQ Corporation and KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES INC.
Defendant: Hyundai Motor Company and Hyundai Motor America
Case Number: 1:2021cv03167
Filed: June 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Guang-Yu Zhu's motion to appear pro hac vice for Defendants #18 is granted. Emailed notice (mw, )
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-18534155. (Zhu, Guang-Yu)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The joint extension motion to answer or to respond to the complaint #12 is granted to 09/21/2021. On review of the status report, R. 15, if the defense is going to move to reassign this case, then the defense should do so promptly. In any event, the tracking status hearing of 08/13/2021 is reset to 10/08/2021 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file an updated status report. In this updated report, the parties shall propose each Local Patent Rule event (through the claim construction chart) with a specific date, listed in chronological order. Emailed notice (mw, )
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang Kyongtaek Kevin Mun's motion to appear pro hac vice for Defendants #13 is granted. Emailed notice (mw, )
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Keystone Automotive Industries Inc., LKQ Corporation (Irwin, Barry)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE by Barry F. Irwin of Change of Address (Irwin, Barry)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-18525408. (Mun, Kyongtaek)
August 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION by Defendants Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company for extension of time to file answer (Shaw, Anne)
July 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Edward Naidich's motion to appear pro hac vice for Defendants #10 is granted. Emailed notice (mw, )
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-18510445. (Naidich, Edward)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company by Anne I-Pin Shaw (Shaw, Anne)
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 08/13/2021 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 08/04/2021. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel ( must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, )
June 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Keystone Automotive Industries Inc., LKQ Corporation by Robyn M Bowland (Bowland, Robyn)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by All Plaintiffs (Irwin, Barry)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company (dxb, )
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (Attachments: #1 patent report )(ec, )
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jg, )
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES INC., LKQ Corporation by Michael P. Bregenzer (Bregenzer, Michael)
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES INC., LKQ Corporation by Barry F. Irwin (Irwin, Barry)
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Irwin, Barry)
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by LKQ Corporation, KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES INC.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18347148. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit 34, #35 Exhibit 35, #36 Exhibit 36, #37 Exhibit 37, #38 Exhibit 38, #39 Exhibit 39, #40 Exhibit 40)(Irwin, Barry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LKQ Corporation et al v. Hyundai Motor America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hyundai Motor Company
Represented By: Edward Joel Naidich
Represented By: Anne I-Pin Shaw
Represented By: Guang-Yu Zhu
Represented By: Kyongtaek Kevin Mun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hyundai Motor America
Represented By: Edward Joel Naidich
Represented By: Anne I-Pin Shaw
Represented By: Guang-Yu Zhu
Represented By: Kyongtaek Kevin Mun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LKQ Corporation
Represented By: Michael P. Bregenzer
Represented By: Barry F. Irwin
Represented By: Robyn M Bowland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES INC.
Represented By: Michael P. Bregenzer
Represented By: Barry F. Irwin
Represented By: Robyn M Bowland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?