Ekberg v. Iwamoto et al
| Carl A. Ekberg |
| Scott Iwamoto and Grant Law, LLC |
| 1:2021cv03188 |
| June 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion to stay #9 is denied. Plaintiff's motion #9 and the court's 8/6/2021 dismissal order and judgment #10 #11 #12 essentially crossed in cyberspace. The 7/9/2021 order #8 gave Plaintiff until 7/30/2021 to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss #7 , and when Plaintiff failed to file a response, the court spent considerable time preparing the dismissal order (with explanatory reasons) and transmitting it for entry on the docket; the court's preparation and completion of the order occurred well before Plaintiff filed his motion. Plaintiff does not explain in his motion why he missed the 7/30/2021 response deadline, and he has no ground to complain that the court prepared and sent for entry the dismissal order a week after he missed that deadline. See Keeton v. Morningstar, Inc., 667 F.3d 877, 884 (7th Cir. 2012) (affirming the district court's denial of a party's motion for leave to make a tardy filing where the court "had already gone through the effort of analyzing the case" and prepared its ruling by the time the tardy filing was submitted). Civil case remains closed.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff Carl A. Ekberg to stay Plaintiff's Motion to Stay or Alternatively, Dismiss (without prejudice) (Payton, Rusty) |
| Filing 12 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 8/6/2021.Mailed notice.(jlj, ) |
Filing 11
ORDER written by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 8/6/2021.Mailed notice.(jlj, )
|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman.Enter order. Defendant's motion to dismiss #7 is granted for the reasons set forth below. This case is dismissed with prejudice, though without prejudice to Plaintiff asserting any applicable defenses as the state court defendant in Robert N. Iwamoto Jr. Revocable Trust v. Ekberg, No. 2020 CH 06927 (Cir. Ct. Cook Cnty., IL). Enter judgment order. The motion hearing set for 8/16/2021 #8 is stricken. The status hearing set for 8/16/2021 #4 is stricken. Civil case closed.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion to dismiss #7 is entered and continued. Plaintiff shall respond to the motion by 7/30/2021; Defendants shall reply by 8/12/2021. Motion hearing set for 8/16/2021 at 9:15 a.m. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: (877) 336-1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Grant Law, LLC, Scott Iwamoto AND MEMORANDUM (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Austin, Ronald) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Grant Law, LLC, Scott Iwamoto by Ronald Austin, Jr (Austin, Ronald) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carl A. Ekberg as to Grant Law, LLC on 6/16/2021, answer due 7/7/2021. (Payton, Rusty) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Initial status hearing set for 8/16/2021 at 9:15 a.m. By 8/9/2021, the parties shall file a joint status report using the form on Judge Feinerman's web page on this District's website. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: (877) 336-1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Grant Law, LLC, Scott Iwamoto (jg, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Carl A. Ekberg by Arthur C. Czaja (Czaja, Arthur) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Carl A. Ekberg by Rusty A. Payton (Payton, Rusty) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Carl A. Ekberg; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18351740. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Trust Deed & Note, #2 Exhibit 2 - Employee Retirement Agreement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Change of Employee Retirement Agreement, #4 Exhibit 4 - FC Complaint, #5 Exhibit 5 - Motion for Default, FC Sale, etc., #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Payton, Rusty) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
