Robles v. Kinum, Inc.
| Evelyn Robles |
| Kinum, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv03220 |
| June 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Status hearing held on 8/11/21. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosure are to be exchanged by 8/19/21. Initial written discovery is due by 9/1/21; the deadline to amend the pleadings and join parties is 12/31/21; fact discovery shall close on 2/28/22. Defendant should provide a written response to the demand by 9/1/21. The Court orders the parties to file a joint written status report by 10/29/21. The report, which shall be as concise as possible, shall set forth: (1) the current deadlines imposed by the Court and whether the matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge in any fashion (e.g., for discovery supervision; for resolution of a motion; for settlement; etc.); (2) the progress of discovery, if discovery is ongoing; (3) the status of briefing on unresolved motions, if any; (4) whether the parties have engaged or are engaging in settlement discussions and the status of those discussions; (5) for cases without any future court dates, an agreed proposed schedule; (6) for cases that have future court dates and if the parties believe there is good cause to extend the current deadlines, a proposed amended schedule and the basis for the request; (7) a request for any agreed action that the Court can take without a hearing; (8) and whether the parties believe a telephonic hearing or in-person hearing is necessary within the next 60 days, and, if so, the issue(s) that warrants discussion and the parties' respective positions. (ca, ) |
| Filing 10 STATUS Report by Evelyn Robles (Davidson, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Kinum, Inc. & Corporate Disclosures (Foster, Nabil) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Kinum, Inc.(Foster, Nabil) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time until 8/5/21 to file a responsive pleading #6 is granted. The joint initial status report is now due by 8/9/21. The Rule 16 initial status hearing remains set for 8/11/21. (ca, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Kinum, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Unopposed (Foster, Nabil) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kinum, Inc. by Nabil G. Foster (Foster, Nabil) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Evelyn Robles as to Kinum, Inc. on 6/24/2021, answer due 7/15/2021. (Davidson, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: A Rule 16 initial status hearing is set for 8/11/21 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report by 8/2/21. The report should comply with the requirements for initial joint status reports set forth in the Initial Status Conference standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==. (ca, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cl, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Kinum, Inc. (txl, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Evelyn Robles by Joseph Scott Davidson (Davidson, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Evelyn Robles; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18356723. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davidson, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robles v. Kinum, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kinum, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Nabil G. Foster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Evelyn Robles | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Scott Davidson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
