Davis v. Saul
| Hattie Davis |
| Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
| 1:2021cv03345 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Heather K McShain |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint #11 is granted. Defendant shall have until 10/22/2021 to file the electronic certified administrative record and answer. Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record. The Social Security Administration's response brief is due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. The Clerk of the Court shall also substitute Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, for her predecessor, Andrew M. Saul, as the named defendant in this suit. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). Mailed notice (ber, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Andrew M. Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding received complaint #1 Unopposed (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Przywara, Kathleen) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: The case has been reassigned to this Court on consent #9 . Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. In addition, Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. This action (1) is neither frivolous nor malicious; (2) states a claim on which relief may be granted; and (3) seeks damages against a defendant who is not immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii). See also Manning v. Arizona, No. 12 C 1019, 2012 WL 1161506, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 9, 2012). In addition, the facts set forth in Plaintiff's affidavit demonstrate that Plaintiff has met the burden of establishing indigence. Mailed notice. (pk, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Heather K. McShain, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Martha M. Pacold no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 6/28/2021. (lma, )
|
| Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Goldbloom, Marcie) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Kathleen M. Przywara as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Przywara, Kathleen) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hattie Davis by Elise D Crawley (Crawley, Elise) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hattie Davis by Beth A. Alpert (Alpert, Beth) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Hattie Davis for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Goldbloom, Marcie) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hattie Davis by Marcie E. Goldbloom (Goldbloom, Marcie) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Goldbloom, Marcie) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and by Hattie Davis (Goldbloom, Marcie) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
