Cleall v. Saul
Plaintiff: Aaron B. Cleall
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 1:2021cv03383
Filed: June 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Gabriel A Fuentes
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2021 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file the electronic certified administrative record and answer to plaintiff's complaint (doc. #12 ) is granted; no appearance on the motion is required. Defendant is given an extension of time for leave to file the electronic certified administrative record, as his answer to plaintiff's complaint, or to otherwise plead, pursuant to Local Rule 8.1 (b) by no later than 5:00 p.m. on or before 10/22/21. Please note that no oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. Mailed notice. (jj, )
August 17, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant Andrew M. Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Ling, Ernest)
July 13, 2021 Filing 11 COMPLAINT filed by Aaron B. Cleall. (Attachments) (ph, )
July 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Fuentes on consent (doc. #9 ). Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. #4 ) is granted. In accordance with Local Rule 16.4, after the filing of the Administrative Record, the Court will set a briefing schedule. The parties are directed to review and comply with Judge Fuentes' standing orders for filing motions and/or proposed orders, which are available on Judge Fuentes' webpage located on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Please note that no oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. Signed by the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes on July 13, 2021. Mailed notice (ph, )
July 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable John F. Kness no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable John F. Kness on 7/9/2021. (ph, )
July 9, 2021 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: As the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all further proceedings #7 , all deadlines and hearings set before this Court are stricken. Mailed notice (ef, )
July 8, 2021 Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Marvin, Cody)
July 8, 2021 Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Ernest Yi Ling as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Ling, Ernest)
July 1, 2021 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's application #4 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). Because the application is incomplete, the Court orders Plaintiff to submit an amended application on or before 07/16/2021. Specifically, the present application fails to provide sufficient information concerning Plaintiff's current income and assets. For example, in Paragraph 3, Plaintiff refers to a joint account with a relative, but it is unclear whether any of the money in that account is for the benefit of Plaintiff. In addition, Plaintiff does not provide any specifics concerning the amount of benefits (if any) he receives in the form of the public assistance he states he receives. In Paragraph 4, Plaintiff states that he has money in a bank account, but he does not describe, as required by the form, how much money is in the account. Plaintiff must address each of these issues in the amended application before the Court can issue a ruling. Plaintiff's counsel must assist Plaintiff in preparing the amended application and must ensure that it is submitted to the Court ex parte and under seal on or before the deadline. Mailed notice (ef, )
June 24, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cl, )
June 23, 2021 Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Aaron B. Cleall for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Marvin, Cody)
June 23, 2021 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Aaron B. Cleall by Cody Thomas Marvin (Marvin, Cody)
June 23, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marvin, Cody)
June 23, 2021 Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Aaron B. Cleall; (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Marvin, Cody) Modified on 6/24/2021 (ph, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cleall v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Ernest Yi Ling
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron B. Cleall
Represented By: Cody Thomas Marvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?