Hernandez v. Mack Trucks, Inc. et al
| Brianna Hernandez as Guardian of the Estate of Javier Diaz and Brianna Hernandez |
| Mack Trucks, Inc. and McNeilus Trucking & Manufacturing, Inc. |
| Ozinga |
| 1:2021cv03432 |
| June 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John F Kness |
| P.I.: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER RULE 16(b). Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 8/23/2021. Mailed notice(ber, )
|
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Upon review of the parties' joint status report (Dkt. #19 ), the Court finds the proposed schedule reasonable under FRCP 16 and thus adopts the parties' recommendation. Because the proposed schedule provides ample time, however, the parties are specifically cautioned that these deadlines must be treated as governing and will not be extended for circumstances that are within the control of the parties. The status hearing set for 8/24/2021 is stricken and reset to 2/8/2022 at 9:45 a.m. Mailed notice (ber, ) |
| Filing 19 STATUS Report (Joint) Under Rule 26(f) by McNeilus Trucking & Manufacturing, Inc. (Laflamme, Eugene) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Telephonic initial status hearing is set for 8/24/2021 at 11:00 AM. Consistent with Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference in advance of the initial status hearing. No later than seven business days before the status hearing, the parties shall jointly complete and file on the docket a report that provides the information required by the Court's model Joint Initial Status Report, which can be found at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?Iu9/vqz23r5X7AkWx/nLtg== (see link entitled "Joint Initial Status Report"). If all Defendants have not yet been served or have not yet responded to requests to draft the required Joint Initial Status Report, Plaintiff must file the report on its own and must inform the Court of that circumstance. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 16 SUPPLEMENT to notice of removal #2 (Laflamme, Eugene) |
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Telephonic status and motion hearing held on 7/22/2021. For the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff's emergency motion for extension of respondent in discovery deadline #13 is denied as moot without prejudice. By the close of business on 7/28/2021, the parties are directed to meet and confer on an agreed date for the vehicle inspection to occur. Motion by counsel for leave to appear pro hac vice #12 is granted. Status hearing 8/24/2021 at 11:00 AM. The parties shall use the same call-in information #14 . Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Defendant's Motion to supplement State Court Record accompanying its Noticeof Removal #9 is granted. Defendant McNeilus Truck and Manufacturing, Inc. must separately file its supplement within 48 hours. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Emergency Motion Hearing set for 7/22/2021 at 10:00 AM. Counsel are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, access code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Plaintiff Brianna Hernandez for extension of time to complete discovery Notice of Filing Emergency Motion (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing Notice of Filing, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit Exhibit G)(Centracchio, David) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-18480084. (Ziemba, Dennis) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Mack Trucks, Inc.(Hogan, Chad) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brianna Hernandez by David R. Centracchio Appearance (Centracchio, David) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant McNeilus Trucking & Manufacturing, Inc. to supplement State Court Record Accompanying its Notice of Removal (ECF No. 2) (Laflamme, Eugene) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by McNeilus Trucking & Manufacturing, Inc.(Laflamme, Eugene) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Respondent Ozinga by Bryan Eliot Curry (Curry, Bryan) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mp, ) |
| Filing 6 MAILED Notice of Removal Letter to Counsel of record. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by McNeilus Trucking & Manufacturing, Inc. (Laflamme, Eugene) |
| Filing 4 Consent to Notice of Removal by McNeilus Trucking & Manufacturing, Inc. (Laflamme, Eugene) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant McNeilus Trucking & Manufacturing, Inc. by Eugene Mathieu Laflamme (Laflamme, Eugene) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from 18th Circuit Dupage Co., case number (21L89) filed by McNeilus Trucking & Manufacturing, Inc. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18395080. (Laflamme, Eugene) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Laflamme, Eugene) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
