Potier v. TransUnion, LLC
| Kim Potier |
| TransUnion, LLC |
| 1:2021cv03451 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sara L Ellis |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STATUS Report by Kim Potier (Hill, Adam) |
| Filing 9 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by TransUnion, LLC re answer to complaint #8 (Brady, Scott) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint And Affirmative Defenses by TransUnion, LLC(Brady, Scott) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant TransUnion, LLC by Laura K. Rang (Rang, Laura) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant TransUnion, LLC by Scott Edwin Brady (Brady, Scott) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kim Potier as to TransUnion, LLC on 7/6/2021, answer due 7/27/2021. (Hill, Adam) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial telephonic status conference in this matter is set for 8/31/2021 at 9:30AM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 8/24/2021. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: (866) 434-5269, Access Code: 8087837. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant TransUnion, LLC (exr, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kim Potier by Adam Theodore Hill (Hill, Adam) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hill, Adam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kim Potier; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18398910.(Hill, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Potier v. TransUnion, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TransUnion, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Scott Edwin Brady |
| Represented By: | Laura K. Rang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kim Potier | |
| Represented By: | Adam Theodore Hill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
