Nelson v. Saul
Ms. Antoinette Rose Nelson |
Commissioner of SSA Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul |
1:2021cv03654 |
July 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Jeffrey Cummings |
Sara L Ellis |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Judge Sara L. Ellis no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 7/30/2021. (kl, ) |
Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Conick, Marshall) |
Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Kathleen Marie Flannery as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Saul (Flannery, Kathleen) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Antoinette Rose Nelson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Conick, Marshall) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Antoinette Rose Nelson by Marshall W. Conick (Conick, Marshall) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Conick, Marshall) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Antoinette Rose Nelson; (Conick, Marshall) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey I. Cummings. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (lxk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.