Crusing v. Barclays Bank Delaware
Laura Scott Crusing |
Barclays Bank Delaware |
1:2021cv03682 |
July 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Robert W Gettleman |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Settlement #11 , this case is dismissed without prejudice with leave to reinstate by 10/15/2021. If a motion to reinstate is not filed on or before 10/15/2021, the dismissal will convert to with prejudice without further order of court. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (cn). |
Filing 11 Notice of Settlement by Laura Scott Crusing (Philipps, David) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Defendant Barclay Bank Delaware's unopposed motion for extension of time to file a responsive pleading #8 is granted. Defendant's responsive pleading due on or before 9/14/2021. Mailed notice (cn). |
Filing 9 Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware's Corporate Disclosure Statement STATEMENT by Barclays Bank Delaware (Murphy, Christopher) |
Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware for extension of time Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading (Murphy, Christopher) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware by Christopher R Murphy (Murphy, Christopher) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Laura Scott Crusing as to Barclays Bank Delaware on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021. (Philipps, David) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laura Scott Crusing by Angie K. Robertson (Robertson, Angie) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laura Scott Crusing by Mary Elizabeth Philipps (Philipps, Mary) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laura Scott Crusing by David J. Philipps (Philipps, David) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Philipps, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Laura Scott Crusing; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18445181.(Philipps, David) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware (exr, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Crusing v. Barclays Bank Delaware | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Laura Scott Crusing | |
Represented By: | Angie K. Robertson |
Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Barclays Bank Delaware | |
Represented By: | Christopher R Murphy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.