Harris v. Kijakazi
| Misty Harris |
| Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 1:2021cv03717 |
| July 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jeffrey Cole |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cole:Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs or extensions of time will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shownMailed notice (yt)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING: Case reassigned to the Honorable Jeffrey Cole, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Mary M. Rowland no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 07/26/2021. (rc, )
|
|
Filing 11
JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Goldbloom, Marcie)
|
|
Filing 10
DESIGNATION of Virginia Ovitz Hancock as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Hancock, Virginia)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: This matter is before the Court for review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security. The parties are strongly encouraged to consider consenting to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. Should the parties elect to do so, the appropriate form to execute and file with the court may be found at the following location: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_public/consent.pdf. Otherwise, the Court sets the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 45 days after the filing of the answer to the complaint and/or the administrative record. The Commissioner's response and brief in support of affirming the decision subject to review is due 30 days thereafter. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due 10 days thereafter. The Court will not consider extension requests absent extenuating circumstances. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 8
COMPLAINT filed by Misty Harris, (Goldbloom, Marcie) (daj, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER : Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #4 is GRANTED. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 7/19/2021. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 6
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Misty Harris by Elise D Crawley (Crawley, Elise)
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Misty Harris by Beth A. Alpert (Alpert, Beth)
|
|
Filing 4
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Misty Harris for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Goldbloom, Marcie)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Misty Harris by Marcie E. Goldbloom (Goldbloom, Marcie)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Goldbloom, Marcie)
|
|
Filing 1
RECEIVED Complaint and by Misty Harris (Goldbloom, Marcie)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
