Laychak v. Barclays Bank Delaware
| Lottie Laychak |
| Barclays Bank Delaware |
| 1:2021cv03796 |
| July 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Pursuant to the notice of settlement, this action is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to reinstate by 10/15/2021. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Settlement by Lottie Laychak (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Unopposed motion for extension of time #10 is granted. Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware is to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's Complaint by 9/14/2021. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware for extension of time Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading (Murphy, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware's Corporate Disclosure Statement STATEMENT by Barclays Bank Delaware (Murphy, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware by Christopher R Murphy (Murphy, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lottie Laychak as to Barclays Bank Delaware on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021. (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: By 9/24/2021, the parties are to file a joint status report. The parties may refer to the format detailed on the Court's website under New and Reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lottie Laychak by Angie K. Robertson (Robertson, Angie) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lottie Laychak by Mary Elizabeth Philipps (Philipps, Mary) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lottie Laychak by David J. Philipps (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lottie Laychak; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18464639.(Philipps, David) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Laychak v. Barclays Bank Delaware | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lottie Laychak | |
| Represented By: | Angie K. Robertson |
| Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
| Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Barclays Bank Delaware | |
| Represented By: | Christopher R Murphy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
