Deang v. Barclays Bank Delaware
| Bryan Deang |
| Barclays Bank Delaware |
| 1:2021cv03805 |
| July 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Notice of Settlement by Bryan Deang (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of time #10 is granted. Defendant's response to the complaint is due 9/14/21 and the parties' initial status report is now due 9/14/21. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware for extension of time Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading (Murphy, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware's Corporate Disclosure Statement STATEMENT by Barclays Bank Delaware (Murphy, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware by Christopher R Murphy (Murphy, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bryan Deang as to Barclays Bank Delaware on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021. (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: By 9/13/21, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bryan Deang by Angie K. Robertson (Robertson, Angie) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bryan Deang by Mary Elizabeth Philipps (Philipps, Mary) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bryan Deang by David J. Philipps (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Bryan Deang; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18467295.(Philipps, David) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware. (ng, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Deang v. Barclays Bank Delaware | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bryan Deang | |
| Represented By: | Angie K. Robertson |
| Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
| Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Barclays Bank Delaware | |
| Represented By: | Christopher R Murphy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
