Austin et al v. Cook County
| Robert A Austin and Raapoetry LLC |
| Cook County and Forensic Clinical Services |
| 1:2021cv03826 |
| July 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Forensic Clinical Services by Megan Marie Honingford (Honingford, Megan)
|
|
Filing 19
STATUS Report by Cook County (Triolo, Molly)
|
|
Filing 18
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: In light of Defendant Cook County's motion to dismiss #17 , the Court advises Plaintiffs to review the Court's Standing Order on Motions to Dismiss, which is available on the Court's homepage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Consistent with the purpose of the Federal Rules "to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, this Court's Standing Order requires Plaintiffs to make an election as to whether Plaintiffs will amend the complaint under Rule 15(a)(1), or stand on the current complaint and proceed with briefing on the motion to dismiss. To this end, Plaintiffs shall file either: (1) an amended complaint within the time limit set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B) (by 9/28/21); or (2) a response to the motion to dismiss by 10/5/21. If Plaintiffs file a response, Defendant shall file a reply by 10/19/21. If Plaintiffs elect to amend their pleading in response to the motion to dismiss, then Defendant shall file within 21 days of the amended pleading either: (1) an answer; or (2) a revised motion to dismiss. Mailed notice (gel, )
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION by Defendant Cook County to dismiss (Triolo, Molly)
|
|
Filing 16
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: In light of this Court's 8/5/21 order #12 , the Court denies Plaintiff's motion #14 as moot. Consistent with prior orders #12 , #13 , Defendant shall respond to the complaint by 9/8/21, and the parties shall file their joint status report by 9/13/21. The 8/26/21 Notice of Motion date is stricken. Mailed notice (gel, )
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE of Motion by Robert A Austin, Raapoetry LLC for presentment of Plaintiffs' response to Defendant Cook County's motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #14 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 8/26/2021 at 11:00 AM. (jn, )
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION by Plaintiffs' Robert A Austin, Raapoetry LLC in response to defendant Cook County's motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead. (jn, )
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. The litigants are ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. In addition, the parties must file a status report no later than 9/13/2021, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. During the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312) 818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. Mailed notice (gel, )
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Defendant's motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #10 is granted and any answer shall be filed on or before 9/8/2021. Motion hearing set for 8/26/2021 is stricken. Mailed notice (gel, )
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Motion by Molly Triolo for presentment of extension of time #10 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 8/26/2021 at 11:00 AM. (Triolo, Molly)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION by Defendant Cook County for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead (Triolo, Molly)
|
|
Filing 9
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cook County by Molly Triolo (Triolo, Molly)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert A Austin, Raapoetry LLC as to Cook County on 7/19/2021, answer due 8/9/2021; Forensic Clinical Services on 7/19/2021, answer due 8/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 as to Forensic Clinical Services) (ph, )
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Filing by Robert A Austin, Raapoetry LLC. (ph, )
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Filing by Robert A Austin, Raapoetry LLC. (ph, )
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Cook County, Forensic Clinical Services. (ph, )
|
|
Filing 3
PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Robert A Austin. (ph, )
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ph, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Robert A Austin, Raapoetry LLC; Jury Demand. (ph, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Judge M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ph, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
