Sanchez v. Tequila555 Corporation et al
Israel Sanchez |
Tequila555 Corporation and Mario Gonzalez |
1:2021cv03881 |
July 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Matthew F Kennelly |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Israel Sanchez as to Tequila555 Corporation on 9/8/2021, answer due 9/29/2021. (Dore, James) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Israel Sanchez as to Mario Gonzalez on 9/8/2021, answer due 9/29/2021. (Dore, James) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Based on plaintiff's status report, the telephonic status hearing set for 9/8/2021 is vacated and reset to 10/14/2021 at 8:55 AM, using call-in number 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Counsel should wait for the case to be called before announcing themselves. A joint status report conforming to the directions in the Court's initial order in this case is to be filed on 10/7/2021. (mk) |
Filing 9 STATUS Report of 9.1.21 by Israel Sanchez (Dore, James) |
ALIAS Summons Issued as to Defendants Mario Gonzalez, Tequila555 Corporation. (cp, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Plaintiff's motion for alternative service of process #7 is granted; plaintiff may serve defendant Mario Gonzalez by US mail and certified mail and may serve Tequila555 via the Illinois Secretary of State. The Clerk is directed to issue alias summonses. (mk) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Israel SanchezAlternative Service of Process on Defendants (Dore, James) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Israel Sanchez as to Tequila555 Corporation. (Dore, James) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Israel Sanchez as to Mario Gonzalez. (Dore, James) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: By no later than 9/1/2021, the parties (or, if no defendant has yet appeared, the plaintiff(s)) are to file a joint status report that includes the following information: (1) the status of service of process upon each defendant; (2) a description of each party's claims and defenses; (3) details regarding any discussions concerning settlement, whether before or after the filing of the lawsuit; (4) a proposed discovery and pretrial schedule; and (5) any other matters that any party wishes to bring to the Court's attention. The case is set for a case management conference under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 on 9/8/2021 at 9:10 a.m. The case management conference will be conducted by telephone, using the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to provide a copy of this order to any defendant that has not yet appeared by counsel via regular mail at the address at which the defendant has been or is to be served with process. (mk) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Mario Gonzalez, Tequila555 Corporation (sxh, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ng, ) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Dore, James) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Israel Sanchez by James M. Dore (Dore, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Israel Sanchez; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18482201.(Dore, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.