Brown v. Kijakazi
| Kimberly S. Brown |
| Andrew Marshall Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 1:2021cv04115 |
| August 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Defendant's motion for reassignment and consolidation based on relatedness #14 is granted. This Court will recommend to the Executive Committee that case 21 C 4118 pending before Judge Chang be reassigned to this Court's calendar and consolidated as related to this action. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 14 MOTION by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi to consolidate cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Souza, Abraham) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED complaint by Kimberly S. Brown against Kilolo Kijakazi. (rc, ) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The court grants defendant's Motion for a More Definite Statement #11 . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) and LR8.1, plaintiff is ordered to file an amended complaint containing plaintiff's full Social Security number. The time for defendant to file her answer is tolled until 60 days following service of plaintiff's amended complaint. See Fed. R. Civ P. 12(a)(2). Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Andrew Marshall Saulfor more definite statement (Souza, Abraham) |
| Filing 10 DESIGNATION of Abraham Judson Souza as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Souza, Abraham) |
| Filing 9 COMPLAINT filed by Kimberly S. Brown. (kl, ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The Court finds that Plaintiff is unable to pay the costs and fees associated with filing this action and thus the filing fee is waived. The Clerk is directed to docket Plaintiff's complaint. This matter is before the Court for review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security. The parties should consult with each other to determine whether they will consent to the reassignment of this case to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, they should file a joint statement of consent pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(a). Otherwise, pursuant to Local Rule 16.4, Plaintiff shall file a brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review within 60 days after the filing of the answer to the complaint and/or the administrative record. Within 45 days thereafter, the Commissioner shall file its motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days thereafter. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 7 RECEIVED Waiver of Service by Plaintiff Kimberly S. Brown. (lma, ) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to Andrew Saul on 7/29/2021 by Plaintiff Kimberly S. Brown. (lma, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Kimberly S. Brown for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (lma, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Kimberly S. Brown (lma, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (lma, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 2 copies by Kimberly S. Brown (lma, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
