Pearl City Elevator, Inc. v. Gieseke
| Pearl City Elevator, Inc. |
| Rod Gieseke |
| 1:2021cv04206 |
| August 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles P Kocoras |
| P.I.: Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE by Pearl City Elevator, Inc.in Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Rod Gieseke to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction #9 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Watkins, Danessa) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction #9 is entered and briefed as follows: Response is due by 9/28/2021; Reply is due by 10/12/2021. Court will rule by mail. Motion hearing set for 9/9/2021 is stricken. Mailed notice (vcf, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Joel M. L. Huotari for presentment of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction #9 before Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 9/9/2021 at 09:30 AM. (Huotari, Joel) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Rod Gieseke to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Huotari, Joel) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Rod Gieseke by Troy E. Haggestad (Haggestad, Troy) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Rod Gieseke by Joel M. L. Huotari (Huotari, Joel) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Pearl City Elevator, Inc. regarding Summons served on Rod Gieseke on August 18, 2021 (Watkins, Danessa) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Rod Gieseke (jmk, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ng, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pearl City Elevator, Inc. by Danessa P. Watkins (Watkins, Danessa) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Pearl City Elevator, Inc. (Jacobson, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pearl City Elevator, Inc. by Ryan Brandon Jacobson (Jacobson, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Jacobson, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Pearl City Elevator, Inc.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18543466. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Jacobson, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pearl City Elevator, Inc. v. Gieseke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pearl City Elevator, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Danessa P. Watkins |
| Represented By: | Ryan Brandon Jacobson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rod Gieseke | |
| Represented By: | Joel M. L. Huotari |
| Represented By: | Troy E. Haggestad |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
