Arora v. NAV Consulting Inc., et al
| Amit Arora |
| NAV Consulting Inc., d/b/a NAV Fund Administration Group and Nav Gupta |
| 1:2021cv04443 |
| August 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sara L Ellis |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amit Arora by Sukrat Ahmed Baber (Corrected) (Baber, Sukrat)
|
|
Filing 7
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amit Arora by Andrew Sean Murphy (Corrected) (Murphy, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 6
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amit Arora by Daniel Reza Saeedi (Corrected) (Saeedi, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amit Arora by Sukrat Ahmed Baber (Baber, Sukrat)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amit Arora by Andrew Sean Murphy (Murphy, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amit Arora by Daniel Reza Saeedi (Saeedi, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Saeedi, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Amit Arora; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18586045. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Saeedi, Daniel)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
