Mele v. Pan-Oceanic Engineering Co., Inc.
| Martin M. Mele and Martin Mele |
| Pan-Oceanic Engineering Co., Inc. |
| 1:2021cv04477 |
| August 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MOTION by Defendant Pan-Oceanic Engineering Co., Inc. to dismiss (Schwartz, Marty)
|
|
Filing 6
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Pan-Oceanic Engineering Co., Inc. by Thomas John Kupchinsky Schick (Schick, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Pan-Oceanic Engineering Co., Inc. by Marty Jay Schwartz (Schwartz, Marty)
|
|
Filing 4
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Pan-Oceanic Engineering Co., Inc.. Pan-Oceanic Engineering Co., Inc. waiver sent on 8/26/2021, answer due 10/25/2021. (Schwartz, Marty)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mxo, )
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Anderson, Burr)
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Martin M. Mele by Burr Erich Anderson (Anderson, Burr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Martin M. Mele; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18593252. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Short Form Agreement, #2 Exhibit Area Agreement, #3 Exhibit Second Amended Complaint)(Anderson, Burr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
