BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. C&H Expedited LLP et al
| BMO Harris Bank N.A. |
| C&H Expedited LLP, Lee Castro and Joshua Huffman |
| 1:2021cv04555 |
| August 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank N.A.for Service by Special Order of Court (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan D. Golding in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Service by Special Order of Court)(Chapin, Aaron) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants C&H Expedited LLP, Lee Castro, Joshua Huffman (jg, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jmk, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by BMO Harris Bank N.A. (Chapin, Aaron) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank N.A. by Aaron B. Chapin (Chapin, Aaron) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Chapin, Aaron) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by BMO Harris Bank N.A.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18603173. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - First Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Second Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - Continuing Guaranties, #4 Exhibit D - Letters)(Chapin, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
