Tersip v. Frost-Arnett Company
| Cheryl Tersip |
| Frost-Arnett Company |
| 1:2021cv04695 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for extension of time to answer #5 is granted. The deadline for Defendant to file a responsive pleading is extended to 10/25/2021.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Defendant Frost-Arnett Company for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 UNOPPOSED Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Martin, Eugene) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Initial status hearing set for 11/8/2021 at 9:15 a.m. Initial Status Report shall be filed by 11/1/2021. Please see Judge Feinerman's web page (http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov) for details on the Initial Status Hearing and Initial Status Report. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: (877) 336-1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cheryl Tersip as to Cheryl Tersip on 9/3/2021, answer due 9/24/2021. (Carlin, John) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Cheryl Tersip by John P Carlin (Carlin, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Cheryl Tersip; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18630067. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Carlin, John) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Frost-Arnett Company. (lxk, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tersip v. Frost-Arnett Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cheryl Tersip | |
| Represented By: | John P Carlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Frost-Arnett Company | |
| Represented By: | Eugene Xerxes Martin, IV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
