Chevrestt v. Bringg, Inc.
Angel Chevrestt |
Bringg, Inc. doing business as Bringg Delivery Technologies Ltd. |
1:2021cv04742 |
September 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sara L Ellis |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 501 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STATUS Report by Angel Chevrestt (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Angel Chevrestt. Bringg, Inc. waiver sent on 10/13/2021, answer due 12/13/2021. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 11/4/2021 at 1:30 PM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 10/28/2021. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: (866) 434-5269, Access Code: 8087837. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Emailed notice (rj, ) |
Filing 7 MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. (jh, ) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Angel Chevrestt as to Bringg, Inc. on 9/23/2021, answer due 10/14/2021. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 5 Response to Court's Request for additional Copyright Information by Angel Chevrestt (Sanders, Craig) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Bringg, Inc. (ak, ) |
Filing 4 MAILED Copyright Request Letter to Plaintiff's Counsel, Craig B. Sanders. (jh, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Angel Chevrestt by Craig B Sanders (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Angel Chevrestt; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18640219. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Sanders, Craig) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ng, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chevrestt v. Bringg, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Angel Chevrestt | |
Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bringg, Inc. doing business as Bringg Delivery Technologies Ltd. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.