Wilk v. Brainshark, Inc.
Plaintiff: Lori Wilk
Defendant: Brainshark, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv04794
Filed: September 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John Robert Blakey
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ENTERED JUDGMENT Mailed notice(gel, )
July 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the filing of the stipulation of dismissal #56 , this case is dismissed with prejudice. Any pending deadlines are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (gel, )
July 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 56 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice (Griswold, Joel)
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to withdraw the appearance of Michael M. Tresnowski #53 , and strikes the 5/10/2023 notice of motion date. Mailed notice (mjc, )
May 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 54 NOTICE of Motion by Douglas M. Werman for presentment of motion to withdraw #53 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 5/10/2023 at 11:00 AM. (Werman, Douglas)
May 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MOTION by Plaintiff Lori Wilk to withdraw Appearance of Attorney Michael M. Tresnowski (Werman, Douglas)
December 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, )
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Having reviewed the parties' 11/7/22 status report #50 , the Court sets initial case management dates as follows: the parties shall exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by 12/1/22, issue written discovery by 12/30/22, amend their pleadings (to add claims, parties, etc.) by 5/31/23, and complete fact discovery by 9/29/23. The parties shall file an updated status report by 9/1/23 confirming that they are on track to complete fact discovery on schedule, confirming that they require expert discovery (and proposing a reasonable schedule for same), and indicating whether either party will seek summary judgment. Additionally, if it has not already done so, Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's demand by 11/30/22. If at any time the parties agree that a settlement conference with the assigned Magistrate Judge could be productive, they should call chambers to so advise, and the Court will enter an appropriate referral order. Mailed notice (gel, )
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 50 STATUS Report (Joint & Initial) by Lori Wilk (Werman, Douglas)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ANSWER to Complaint by Brainshark, Inc.(Lenz, Amy)
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to withdraw the appearance of Attorney Bernard K. Schott #46 , directs the Clerk to remove Attorney Schott from the docket in this case, and strikes the 10/11/22 Notice of Motion date. The 10/24/22 answer and 11/7/22 status report deadlines stand. Mailed notice (gel, )
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 47 NOTICE of Motion by Douglas M. Werman for presentment of motion to withdraw #46 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 10/11/2022 at 11:00 AM. (Werman, Douglas)
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MOTION by Plaintiff Lori Wilk to withdraw Appearance of Attorney Bernard K. Schott (Werman, Douglas)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 9/27/2022. Mailed notice(gel, )
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies Defendant's motion to dismiss #21 . Defendant shall file an answer to the Complaint on or before 10/24/22 and the parties shall file a joint status report by 11/7/22 proposing reasonable case management dates, including fact discovery and (if needed) expert discovery deadlines. Although, to date, the parties have not indicated an interest in settlement, they should call chambers if they jointly believe that a settlement conference with the assigned Magistrate Judge could be helpful, and the Court will enter an appropriate referral order. Mailed notice (gel, )
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lori Wilk by Sarah Jean Arendt (Arendt, Sarah)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lori Wilk by Michael Mark Tresnowski (Tresnowski, Michael)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lori Wilk by Maureen Ann Salas (Salas, Maureen)
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 40 PLAINTIFF'S THIRD NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY CONCERNING THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Lori Wilk (Fish, David)
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 39 RESPONSE by Defendant Brainshark, Inc. to other #38 in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Notice of Supplemental Authority (Lenz, Amy)
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 38 PLAINTIFF'S SECOND NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY CONCERNING THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Lori Wilk (Fish, David)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Brainshark, Inc. by Bonnie Keane DelGobbo (DelGobbo, Bonnie)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 36 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY CONCERNING THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT by Lori Wilk #21 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Fish, David)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Defendant's motion to strike #33 unrelated pleadings erroneously filed on the docket in this case and directs the Clerk to remove #31 , [31-1], [31-2], and #32 from the docket in this case. Mailed notice (gel, )
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 34 REPLY by Brainshark, Inc. to MOTION by Defendant Brainshark, Inc. to dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint #21 (Lenz, Amy)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MOTION by Defendant Brainshark, Inc. to strike First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Brainshark, Inc. #31 , notice of filing #32 (Lenz, Amy)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 32 NOTICE by Brainshark, Inc. of Constitutional Challenge Pursuant to Rule 5.1 (Lenz, Amy)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 31 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Brainshark, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Declaration)(Lenz, Amy)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 RESPONSE by Lori Wilkin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Brainshark, Inc. to dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint #21 (Schott, Bernard)
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Plaintiff's unopposed motion for leave to file an oversized brief #27 and strikes the 1/13/22 Notice of Motion date. Mailed notice (gel, )
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 NOTICE of Motion by Bernard Schott for presentment of motion for leave to file #27 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/13/2022 at 11:00 AM. (Schott, Bernard)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MOTION by Plaintiff Lori Wilk for leave to file Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss not to Exceed 21 Pages (Unopposed) (Schott, Bernard)
December 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Zachary C. Flowerree's motion to withdraw #24 is granted. Motion hearing set for 1/4/2022 is stricken. Mailed notice (gel, )
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 NOTICE of Motion by Douglas M. Werman for presentment of motion to withdraw #24 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/4/2022 at 11:00 AM. (Werman, Douglas)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MOTION by Plaintiff Lori Wilk to withdraw Appearance of Attorney Zachary C. Flowerree (Werman, Douglas)
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Defendant has moved to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint, see #21 . Plaintiff shall review the Court's Standing Order on Motions to Dismiss, which is available on the Court's homepage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Consistent with the purpose of the Federal Rules "to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, this Court's Standing Order requires Plaintiff to make an election as to whether Plaintiff will amend the complaint under Rule 15(a)(1), or stand on the current complaint and proceed with briefing on the motion to dismiss. To this end, Plaintiff shall file either an amended complaint or a response to the motion to dismiss by 1/7/22. If Plaintiff files a response, Defendant shall file a reply by 1/14/22. If Plaintiff elects to amend her complaint in response to the motion to dismiss, then Defendant shall file within 21 days of the amended pleading either: (1) an answer; or (2) a revised motion to dismiss. Mailed notice (gel, )
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Notice of Withdrawal of Leah Bruno as Lead Counsel by Brainshark, Inc. (Bruno, Leah)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MOTION by Defendant Brainshark, Inc. to dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint (Lenz, Amy)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STATUS Report Joint by Lori Wilk (Pacheco-De Loera, Thalia)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lori Wilk by Bernard Schott (Schott, Bernard)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time #16 is granted and any answer shall be filed on or before 12/17/2021. Mailed notice (gel, )
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Brainshark, Inc. by Joel Griswold (Griswold, Joel)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MOTION by Defendant Brainshark, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Lenz, Amy)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Brainshark, Inc. by Amy Lynn Lenz Appearance of Amy Lenz on behalf of Defendant Brainshark, Inc. (Lenz, Amy)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Brainshark, Inc. by Amy Lynn Lenz Appearance of Joel Griswold on behalf of Defendant Brainshark, Inc. (Lenz, Amy)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lori Wilk by David J. Fish (Fish, David)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lori Wilk by Mara Ann Baltabols (Baltabols, Mara)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Defendant's second unopposed motion for an extension of time #10 . Defendant shall file its answer or other responsive pleading by 12/6/21, and the parties shall file their joint status report by 12/10/21. Mailed notice (gel, )
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Brainshark, Inc. for extension of time to file answer (Defendant Brainshark Inc's Unopposed Motion for Extension to File Response to Complaint) (Bruno, Leah)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. #8 . Defendant shall file its answer or responsive pleading by 11/4/21. The Court also strikes the prior 10/25/21 Status Report deadline #5 . The parties shall file a status report on or before 11/18/21 using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Mailed notice (gel, )
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Brainshark, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Bruno, Leah)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Brainshark, Inc. by Leah Rachel Bruno (Bruno, Leah)
September 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lori Wilk as to Brainshark, Inc. on 9/14/2021, answer due 10/5/2021. (Werman, Douglas)
September 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. The litigants are ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. In addition, the parties must file a status report no later than 10/25/2021, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. During the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312) 818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. Mailed notice (gel, )
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Brainshark, Inc. (ak, )
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lori Wilk by Douglas M. Werman (Werman, Douglas)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lori Wilk by Zachary Cole Flowerree (Flowerree, Zachary)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Flowerree, Zachary)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Class Action Complaint) filed by Lori Wilk; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18651524.(Flowerree, Zachary)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilk v. Brainshark, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Wilk
Represented By: Douglas M. Werman
Represented By: Zachary Cole Flowerree
Represented By: David J. Fish
Represented By: Mara Ann Baltabols
Represented By: Bernard Schott
Represented By: Maureen Ann Salas
Represented By: Michael Mark Tresnowski
Represented By: Sarah Jean Arendt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brainshark, Inc.
Represented By: Leah Rachel Bruno
Represented By: Joel Griswold
Represented By: Amy Lynn Lenz
Represented By: Bonnie Keane DelGobbo
Represented By: Joel C Griswold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?