Giles v. Chicago et al
| Marc Giles |
| City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed, Alvin Jones, Brian Bolton, Kenneth Young, Darryl Edwards, Matthew Cadman, Michael Spaargaren, Gerome Summers, Calvin Ridgell, Superintendent Terry Hillard, Debra Kirby, Karen Rowan, Former Officer Kallatt Mohammed, Sergeant Alvin Jones, Officer Brian Bolton, Officer Kenneth Young, Officer Darryl Edwards, Officer Matthew Cadman, Officer Michael Spaargaren, Officer Gerome Summers and Officer Calvin Ridgell |
| 1:2021cv04798 |
| September 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert M Dow |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Because this case is before Judge Valderrama and Magistrate Judge Finnegan for pretrial proceedings, the telephonic status hearing set for 11/5/2021 with Judge Dow is stricken. Emailed notice (cdh, ) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kallatt Mohammed by Sean M. Sullivan (Sullivan, Sean) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kallatt Mohammed by Kathryn M. Doi (Doi, Kathryn) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kallatt Mohammed by Eric S. Palles (Palles, Eric) |
| Filing 11 STATUS Report Joint by Marc Giles (Rauscher, Scott) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Joint status report due by 11/1/2021. Initial telephone conference is set for 11/5/2021 at 9:00 a.m. and parties are to report the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial; (3) The report should include a proposed case management schedule reflecting any disputes between the parties as to the proposed schedule. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the Courts action herein. The parties are requested to file a joint status report at least THREE business days prior to the initial status and ALL further status hearings. For further details see the Court's website available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Participants should use the Court's toll-free call-in number 877-336-1829, conference access code is 6963747. Emailed notice (cdh, ) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marc Giles by Theresa H. Kleinhaus (Kleinhaus, Theresa) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marc Giles by Joshua Alan Tepfer (Tepfer, Joshua) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marc Giles by Jonathan I. Loevy (Loevy, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marc Giles by Arthur R. Loevy (Loevy, Arthur) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marc Giles by Sean Starr (Starr, Sean) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marc Giles by Scott R. Rauscher (Rauscher, Scott) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marc Giles by Mariah Esperanza Garcia (Garcia, Mariah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Garcia, Mariah) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jmk, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Marc Giles ; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18652401.(Garcia, Mariah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
