Manzi, Jr. v. Dart et al
| Michael Manzi, Jr. |
| Thomas J. Dart, Officer Lietz, John Doe and Sgt. Cortez |
| 1:2021cv04889 |
| September 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 11/8/2021. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER : By order dated September 20, 2021 #5 , the Court directed Plaintiff to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit, and advised him that failure to comply by October 15, 2021, would result in summary dismissal of this case without prejudice. As of today's date, Plaintiff has not responded, and the Court has not heard from Plaintiff since entry of the September 20, 2021, order #5 . Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See Fed. Election Comm'n v. Al Salvi for Senate Comm., 205 F.3d 1015, 1018 (7th Cir. 2000) (court has authority both inherently and under Rule 41(b) to dismiss case as sanction for failure to prosecute and noncompliance with court order). Having brought this action, Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The Court directs the Clerk to enter a final judgment of dismissal. This case is closed. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 11/8/2021. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Manzi, Jr.; Jury Demand. (Envelope not postmarked) (kl, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $21.15 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee, and to make monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk of Court is directed to electronically send a copy of this order to the Supervisor of the Inmate Trust Fund Accounts at the Cook County Jail. Summonses, however, shall not issue at this time. Based on dates given in the complaint, Plaintiff is ordered to show good cause in writing why the complaint should not be dismissed for his failure to exhaust administrative remedies before initiating this lawsuit. Failure to respond to this order by October 15, 2021, will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is dismissed without prejudice to renewal should this case be allowed to proceed. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 9/20/2021. Mailed notice. (kl, )
|
| EMAILED a copy of the Order dated 9/20/2021 to Supervisor of the Inmate Trust Fund Accounts at the Cook County Jail. (kl, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Michael Manzi, Jr. for attorney representation (kl, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Michael Manzi, Jr. for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments) (kl, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (kl, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Michael Manzi, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope not postmarked) (kl, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (kl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
