Minnifield v. Gomez et al
Michael Minnifield |
Warden Gomez, Major Malkowski, Lt. Gray and John Doe #1 |
1:2021cv04982 |
September 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Steven C Seeger |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the letter from Plaintiff Minnifield (Dckt. No. #5 ). The letter included a change of address. Minnifield is now incarcerated at Menard Correctional Center in Menard, Illinois. The Court appreciates the update, and the Clerk's Office will update the docket accordingly. Mailed notice (jjr, ) |
Filing 5 LETTER from Michael Minnifield dated 10/18/2021. (Envelope Postmark date Illegible) (jh, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Michael Minnifield for attorney representation (mp, ) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Michael Minnifield for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits) (mp, ) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (mp, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Michael Minnifield (mp, )(Exhibits) Docket text modified by clerk's office on 9/21/2021 (mp, ). |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.