Ingram v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff: Jessie Ingram
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Chicago Union Station Company, CBRE, Inc., Total Facility Maintenance, Inc. and Scrub, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv04984
Filed: September 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Referring Judge: Young B Kim
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2021 Filing 31 CERTIFICATE of Service of Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures by Richard Andrew Valek on behalf of CBRE, Inc., National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Scrub, Inc. (Valek, Richard)
October 29, 2021 Filing 30 7.1 Disclosure Statement STATEMENT by Total Facility Maintenance, Inc. (Schroeder, David)
October 27, 2021 Filing 29 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Scrub, Inc. (Valek, Richard)
October 27, 2021 Filing 28 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Valek, Richard)
October 27, 2021 Filing 27 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by CBRE, Inc. (Valek, Richard)
October 26, 2021 Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Defendants are ordered to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Local Rule 3.2 by November 2, 2021. Parties are ordered to adhere to the following written discovery schedule: (1) exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by November 19, 2021; (2) serve written discovery requests by December 3, 2021 (requests to admit may be timely served before the end of fact discovery); (3) serve answers to written discovery requests by January 7, 2022; (4) confer about the adequacy of the discovery responses by January 21, 2022; and (5) file a joint status report identifying each side's written discovery issues, along with the relevant written discovery responses as exhibits, by January 28, 2021. The court will not consider general objections to written discovery requests if the court must address and rule on written discovery disputes. If the parties do not have any disputed written discovery issues, a status report is not required. Pursuant to Rule of Evidence 502(d), this court orders that inadvertent disclosures of attorney-client privileged and attorney work materials will not constitute a waiver of the associated privilege. The court further orders that upon written notification (including emails) from the opposing side that an inadvertent disclosure has occurred, the party shall return and/or destroy the materials at issue or file a motion for a determination on the claimed privilege within seven calendar days of the written notification. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER REASSIGNING: Case reassigned to the Honorable Young B. Kim , pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Edmond E. Chang no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 10/22/2021. (rc, )
October 22, 2021 Filing 24 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the joint consent to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction, R. 21, the tracking status hearing of 10/29/2021 for Judge Chang is vacated. The consent will be processed with the Executive Committee. Emailed notice (mw, )
October 20, 2021 Filing 23 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Jessie Ingram of Defendant Chicago Union Station Company (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Nepustil, Nicholas)
October 20, 2021 Filing 22 STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by Jessie Ingram (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Nepustil, Nicholas)
October 20, 2021 Filing 21 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Nepustil, Nicholas)
October 15, 2021 Filing 20 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Total Facility Maintenance, Inc. by David H. Schroeder (Schroeder, David)
October 15, 2021 Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Total Facility Maintenance, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Schroeder, David)
October 14, 2021 Filing 18 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jessie Ingram by Nicholas Nepustil (Nepustil, Nicholas)
October 13, 2021 Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing National Passenger Railroad's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Valek, Richard)
October 13, 2021 Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by Scrub, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing Scrub Inc.'s Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Valek, Richard)
October 13, 2021 Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by CBRE, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing CBRE Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Valek, Richard)
October 13, 2021 Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant CBRE, Inc. by Richard Andrew Valek (Valek, Richard)
October 13, 2021 Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation by Richard Andrew Valek (Valek, Richard)
October 13, 2021 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The motion to substitute counsel for Defendants National Railroad Passenger Corp. d/b/a Amtrak and CBRE, Inc. #10 , is granted as follows: the appearance of Susan Laing of Anderson Rasor & Partners is terminated Amtrak. The appearance of Kurt Olsen of Krakar & Olsen is terminated as to CBRE, Inc. Attorney Richard A. Valek of Stone & Johnson is added as counsel for Defendants Amtrak and CBRE. For future reference, under General Order 21-0027 (available on the District Court's website), Local Rule 5.3(b) is suspended, so motions should not be noticed for presentment. Emailed notice (mw, )
October 8, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by Richard Andrew Valek for presentment of motion to substitute attorney #10 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 10/14/2021 at 08:30 AM. (Valek, Richard)
October 8, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant CBRE, Inc. to substitute attorney Motion by National Railroad Passenger Corporation to Substitute Attorneys (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Valek, Richard)
October 8, 2021 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Scrub, Inc. by Richard Andrew Valek (Valek, Richard)
October 2, 2021 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Defendant Amtrak's extension motion and Defendant CBRE's extension motion to answer #6 #7 are granted to 10/15/2021. Any other currently served Defendant with an earlier answer deadline also may have until 10/15/2021. Initial tracking status hearing set for 1029/2021 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 10/20/2021. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases.Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, )
September 28, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant CBRE, Inc. for extension of time to file responsive pleading (Olsen, Kurt)
September 27, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation for extension of time to file answer AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING (Laing, Susan)
September 21, 2021 Filing 5 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (txl, )
September 21, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service Proof of Filing Copy of Filed Notice of Removal in Circuit Court by Susan Kay Laing on behalf of National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak (Laing, Susan)
September 21, 2021 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak by Susan Kay Laing (Laing, Susan)
September 21, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Laing, Susan)
September 21, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2021 L 008083) filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18688121. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Laing, Susan)
September 21, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ingram v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessie Ingram
Represented By: Corey A. Benjamin
Represented By: Nicholas Nepustil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Represented By: Susan Kay Laing
Represented By: Richard Andrew Valek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chicago Union Station Company
Represented By: Richard Andrew Valek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CBRE, Inc.
Represented By: Richard Andrew Valek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Total Facility Maintenance, Inc.
Represented By: David H. Schroeder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scrub, Inc.
Represented By: Richard Andrew Valek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?