Zhang v. Mayorkas, et al
| Jianheng Zhang |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and Director Loren Miller |
| 1:2021cv05417 |
| October 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 1/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Initial Status Report outline) (rao, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jianheng Zhang by David Chien (Chien, David) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren Miller (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren Miller (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jianheng Zhang; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18761587. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Chien, David) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cxr, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren Miller, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (cxr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
