Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Ambir Technology, Inc.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. |
Ambir Technology, Inc. |
1:2021cv05457 |
October 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John F Kness |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: On 12/8/2021, the parties filed a jointly-executed stipulation of dismissal #11 explaining that they jointly stipulate to the dismissal of this action. Accordingly, the claims against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice, and the counterclaims against Plaintiff are dismissed without prejudice, based on the terms of the parties' stipulation and by operation of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 587 (7th Cir. 2011) (Rule 41(a)(1)(A) notice of dismissal "is self-executing and effective without further action from the court"). Each party is to bear its own fees and costs. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to counterclaim by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: The motion of counsel Lance Wyatt to appear pro hac vice #8 is granted. Counsel is directed to review LR 83.15(a) and to be prepared to designate local counsel. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-18869017. (Wyatt, Lance) |
Filing 7 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Ambir Technology, Inc. (Mcnabnay, Neil) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM filed by Ambir Technology, Inc. against Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. . by Ambir Technology, Inc.(Mcnabnay, Neil) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 10/21/2021: Telephonic initial status hearing is set for 12/22/2021 at 10:10 AM. Consistent with Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference in advance of the initial status hearing. No later than five business days before the status hearing, the parties shall jointly complete and file on the docket a report that provides the information required by the Court's model Joint Initial Status Report, which can be found at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?Iu9/vqz23r5X7AkWx/nLtg== (see link entitled "Joint Initial Status Report"). If all Defendants have not yet been served or have not yet responded to requests to draft the required Joint Initial Status Report, Plaintiff must file the report on its own and must inform the Court of that circumstance. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice(ef, ) |
Filing 4 MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (jg, ) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. by Isaac Philip Rabicoff (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18767269. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Ambir Technology, Inc. (cm, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Ambir Technology, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. | |
Represented By: | Isaac Philip Rabicoff |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ambir Technology, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Lance Eric Wyatt, Jr. |
Represented By: | Neil J. Mcnabnay |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.